Circuit Breaker Interrupting Rating Calculations

Circuit Breaker Interrupting Rating Calculations

Circuit Breaker. While the determination of the closing and latching duty is fairly a straightforward process, the calculation of the interrupting duty for medium- and high-voltage circuit breakers is a bit trickier. There are a few more things to consider in the calculation such as circuit breaker interrupting time and contact parting time, remote and local short circuit current sources (for Synchronous Generators), and circuit breaker rating structure.

Medium- and High-Voltage Circuit Breaker Rated Cycle

The calculation of circuit breaker interrupting duty depends on how fast it can clear the fault, more specifically, from the time of short circuit initiation up to the time when breaker primary contacts part. This duration is commonly referred to as the circuit breaker contact parting time or CPT.

Figure 1 shows the sequence of events from the initiation of the short circuit up to the extinction of arc on primary arcing contacts. It is important to note that the contact parting time assumes a relay time (time from fault initiation up to the time the trip command is given) of 0.5 cycles. The default contact parting time is dependent on the breaker interrupting speed. Table 1 shows the breaker interrupting time and its corresponding contact parting time.

Circuit Breaker Rated Cycle
Figure 1. Circuit Breaker Rated Cycle
Circuit Breaker Interrupting and Contact Parting Time
Table 1. Circuit Breaker Interrupting and Contact Parting Time

Practical experience: Circuit breaker contact parting time is the rounded up (nearest whole number) value of half its interrupting (except 2 cycle CB). For example, the contact parting time of a 5 cycle circuit breaker is 2.5 rounded up, 3 cycles!

AC Decay in Short Circuit Calculations

Synchronous generators and induction motors’ short-circuit contribution varies with time. To account for this, an equivalent circuit is used with time-varying impedances driven by a constant voltage source. This approach simplifies the calculation process while still providing an adequate estimation of the short circuit current. Figure 2 shows a typical short circuit current waveform and its representation based on time-varying impedances.

Circuit Breaker AC Decay: Time-varying Impedances
Figure 2. AC Decay: Time-varying Impedances

Remember that the closing and latching duty calculations are based on symmetrical short circuit current from the 0.5 cycle network (also referred to as the subtransient network). The multiplying factors were derived from the ‘half-cycle’ current assumption. The calculation of the medium- and high-voltage circuit breaker interrupting duty, on the other hand, is based on its contact parting which ranges from 1.5 to 4 cycles as shown in table 1.

For this reason, the impedances to be used in the calculation of the symmetrical short circuit current should be based on the 1.5-4 cycle network (also referred to as the transient network). Table 2 shows the rotating equipment reactances from 0.5, 1.5-4, and 30 cycle networks.

Machine Reactances
Table 2. Machine Reactances

DC Decay in Short Circuit Calculations

Short circuit current asymmetry results from the transient dc component that decays exponentially with time. A detailed calculation will require different rates of decay for various X/R ratio between one source and the fault point. For multisource systems, this could be quite cumbersome.

The use of a single equivalent X/R ratio was recommended in order to simplify the calculation process. However, this single X/R ratio is not your typical X/R derived from the Thevenin’s equivalent impedance. Instead, the single X/R ratio is to be calculated from the ‘separate X and R’ networks.

Separate X and R Networks

The rationale behind this is that the X/R ratio from the ‘separate X and R’ network will generally be greater than the Thevenin’s equivalent. Hence yielding a certain degree of conservatism. To illustrate this, consider the network shown in figure 3. The utility and generator are parallel sources to the fault.

Network Diagram
Figure 3. Network Diagram

Figure 4 shows the impedance diagram of the network shown in figure 3.

Impedance Diagram
Figure 4. Impedance Diagram

A Thevenin’s equivalent circuit will yield and equivalent impedance, Zth, as shown in figure 5.

Thevenin's Equivalent Circuit
Figure 5. Thevenin’s Equivalent Circuit

Using the ‘separate X and R’ reduction, the network shown in figure 3 is decomposed into separate X and R networks as shown in figure 6.

Separate X and R Networks used in Circuit Breaker X/R ratio
Figure 6. Separate X and R Networks

From this network, the fault point X/R ratio is calculated.

DC Decay Multiplying Factors

DC decay in ANSI short circuit studies is accounted for by introducing multiplying factors to the symmetrical current. In the previous article, multiplying factors in the calculation of circuit breaker closing and latching duty were introduced. The instantaneous short circuit current is composed of two components, the transient dc component, and the steady-state ac component.

While the steady-state ac component is symmetrical, the transient dc component decays exponentially with time-based on the system X/R ratio. This creates asymmetry consequently increasing the magnitude of the fault current in the first few cycles of its inception. The multiplying factors in determining the first cycle asymmetrical peak and RMS value of the short circuit current are based on the ‘half-cycle’ current and a purely reactive circuit assumption.

Asymmetrical Multiplying Factor (Peak)
Asymmetrical Multiplying Factor (RMS)

Remote and Local Short Circuit Current Sources (for Synchronous Generators)

Synchronous generators have a special treatment in the interrupting duty calculation for medium- and high-voltage circuit breakers in that their short circuit contribution varies depending on their proximity to the fault. Generator contribution can either be local or remote. Generators are considered remote if

Remote generator, Ig < 0.4It

the generator contribution, Ig, to the fault is lesser than 0.4 times the value of a hypothetical three-phase fault, It, at its terminal, or

Remote generator, Zext >= X"d

the per-unit impedance external to the generator up to the fault point is at least 1.5 times its per unit subtransient impedance on a common system MVA base or

Remote generator, two transformers away

the generator is located at least two transformers away from the fault point.

Otherwise, they are considered local to the fault.

Importance of Determining Remote and Local Contributions

The identification of generators as local or remote is important in determining the correct multiplying factors used in the calculation of breaker interrupting duty. For a specific generator, the multiplying factor, if it was identified as remote is greater than if it was local.

Why is this so?

If we inspect the network reactances for synchronous generators in table 2, the values are the same for the 0.5 cycle and 1.5-4 cycle networks. This is intentional since generator AC decay is conditional on its proximity to the fault. AC decay is considered only for local generators while remote generators are assumed to feature no AC decay. In other words, the remote multiplying factor for generators is higher in magnitude than its local counterpart.

Remote Multiplying Factors

Since the remote multiplying factor only accounts for the DC decay, it can be calculated analytically using the instantaneous short-circuit current equation with time t set to the circuit breaker contact parting time (CPT).

Circuit breaker Interrupting RMS equation 1
Circuit breaker Interrupting RMS equation 2
Circuit breaker Interrupting RMS equation 3
Circuit breaker remote multiplying factor

Local Multiplying Factors

The local multiplying factors, however, are dependent on a list of curves provided under the IEEE Std C37.5 for totally rated circuit breakers and IEEE Std C37.010 for symmetrically rated circuit breakers. The following figure shows the local multiplying factors for totally rated circuit breakers.

Figure 8. Local Multiplying Factor for Totally Rated Circuit Breaker

Totally and Symmetrically Rated Circuit Breakers

Medium- and high-voltage circuit breakers are rated either on a total current or symmetrical current basis under the applicable standard, IEEE Std C37.5 and C37.010, respectively. Totally rated circuit breakers reflect an earlier breaker rating structure while symmetrically rated circuit breaker reflect a more recent rating structure.

Both rating structures quantify the DC decay by applying local and remote multiplying factors. The difference between these rating structures is that symmetrically rated circuit breakers already have an embedded asymmetry factor, S. This asymmetry factor is based on a required percent value of the DC component on a standard time constant of 45ms corresponding to an X/R ratio of 17 for 60Hz system.

Circuit breaker Interrupting C37.010

where

Circuit Breaker Percent DC Equation C37.010

Figure 9 shows the required %dc component for different circuit breaker contact parting times.

Circuit Breaker Interrupting Rating Percent DC at Different CPT C37.010
Figure 9. Percent DC Component for Different Contact Parting Times

Remote and Local multiplying factors for symmetrically rated circuit breakers are obtained by dividing the multiplying factors for totally rated circuit breakers by the applicable asymmetry factor, S. Table 3 shows the S factor for the typical circuit breaker contact parting times.

S-factor for Typical Circuit Breaker Contact Parting Time
Table 3. S-factor for Typical Circuit Breaker Contact Parting Time

Adjust both the calculated remote multiplying factor and local multiplying factors obtained from the local curve to account for this embedded asymmetry using,

Adjusted remote multiplying factor
Adjusted local multiplying factor

Calculate the circuit breaker interrupting duty using the ‘No AC Decay’ approach as recommended in IEEE Std 551.

where

Circuit Breaker Interrupting Rating  Adjusted Multiplying Factor ETAP
Circuit Breaker Interrupting Rating No AC Decay Ratio ETAP

References

IEEE Std 551-2006 [The Violet Book]: Recommended Practice for Calculating AC Short-Circuit Currents in Industrial and Commercial Power Systems. (2006). S.I.: IEEE.

IEEE Std C37.5-1979: ANSI Guide for Calculation of Fault Currents for Application of AC High-Voltage Circuit Breakers Rated on a Total Current Basis. (1979). S.I.: IEEE.

IEEE Std C37.010-2016: IEEE Application Guide for AC High-Voltage Circuit Breakers > 1000 Vac Rated on a Symmetrical Current Basis. (2016). S.I.: IEEE.

IEEE Std C37.04-2018: IEEE Standard for Ratings and Requirements for AC High-Voltage Circuit Breakers with Rated Maximum Voltage Above 1000 V. (2018). S.I.: IEEE.

ETAP Enterprise Solution for Electrical Power Systems Online Help

9 thoughts on “Circuit Breaker Interrupting Rating Calculations

  1. cual es la diferencia entre..INTERRUPTING RATING and SHORT-CIRCUIT CURRENT RATING

    1. Hi Andres,

      Short-circuit rating is a general term and is used interchangeably with interrupting ratings when you talk about low-voltage circuit breakers and fuses. For medium- and high-voltage circuit breakers, the short-circuit current rating actually refers to two specifications, (1) the close and latch rating, and (2) the interrupting rating. Let us know if you have further questions.

      Thank you!

Tell us what you think